KAMPALA — Deputy Chief Justice-designate Moses Kawumi Kazibwe has issued a stern warning to Research Magistrates at the Court of Appeal against leaking confidential judicial documents, saying allegations that some officers have sold draft judgments to litigants pose a serious threat to the integrity of Uganda's Judiciary.
Speaking during an engagement with Research Magistrates and Registrars at the Court of Appeal in Kampala, Justice Kazibwe said confidentiality remains one of the cornerstones of judicial independence and public confidence in the courts.
His remarks come amid growing concern within the Judiciary over the handling of sensitive court documents and the increasing reliance on digital systems for case management and judgment preparation.
“The integrity of the Judiciary depends on our ability to safeguard confidential information and maintain public trust,” Justice Kazibwe said.
He revealed that reports had reached judicial leadership alleging that some officers had leaked or sold draft judgments before they were officially delivered by court.
Although he did not cite specific cases, he warned that such conduct compromises the administration of justice and damages the credibility of the institution.
Justice Kazibwe emphasized that Research Magistrates occupy a critical position within the judicial process because they provide the legal analysis and research that often form the foundation of appellate court decisions.
He commended the researchers for their contribution to the work of the Justices but reminded them that the quality of their research directly influences the quality of judgments issued by the Court.
“Own that judgment as yours, as for the Court, and feel proud when it comes out and it is excellent,” he said.
The Deputy Chief Justice-designate also called for greater professionalism and attention to detail, warning that incomplete or inaccurate research could mislead judges, particularly at the appellate level where complex legal questions and heavy caseloads require robust legal support.
He stressed that excellence in judicial work extends beyond legal reasoning to include timeliness and efficiency.
According to Justice Kazibwe, delays in legal research and judgment drafting can affect the Court's ability to meet constitutional and statutory timelines, ultimately delaying justice for litigants.
He further reminded the researchers that they are an integral part of the Court of Appeal and that their conduct reflects directly on the institution's reputation.
Describing the Court of Appeal as a vital training ground for future judicial leaders, Justice Kazibwe encouraged the researchers to use their positions to gain knowledge, experience and professional discipline that will prepare them for higher responsibilities within the Judiciary.
At the same time, he pledged support to officers who maintain professional integrity and face unfounded accusations.
“I will protect and defend any of you when your integrity is not in question, where you are being falsely accused. I will not do so where the evidence is against you,” he said.
Meanwhile, Geoffrey Kiryabwire, who also serves as the Court's Administrator, echoed the call for discretion and professionalism.
Justice Kiryabwire cautioned that breaches of confidentiality do not always occur through deliberate leaks, noting that sensitive information can sometimes be exposed through casual conversations and careless interactions.
He urged Research Magistrates to maintain close professional relationships with the Justices they support and reminded them that they are bound by the same Judicial Code of Conduct that governs other judicial officers.
Justice Kiryabwire also acknowledged concerns raised by staff regarding technological resources, including computers, laptops and internet connectivity.
He noted that the Judiciary's growing dependence on digital platforms such as the Electronic Court Case Management Information System (ECCMIS), the Judgment Writing Tool, LexisNexis and the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ULII) makes adequate technological support essential for effective judicial service delivery.
The remarks underscore the Judiciary's continued efforts to strengthen accountability, improve efficiency and safeguard public confidence in Uganda's justice system at a time when courts are increasingly embracing digital processes.