In a statement issued on Monday, the ULS emphasised that its decision is anchored in its “longstanding commitment to demilitarisation and the protection of human rights, separation of powers, and judicial independence.”
The ULS cited its history of opposing militarism’s encroachment on civilian institutions, pointing to its role in Constitutional Petition 18 of 2005 as evidence of its consistent stance.
“We remain resolute in our denunciation of policies that undermine the rule of law and constitutional governance,” the statement read.
Through its High Profile Case Unit, which operates under the Office of the ULS President, the society said it would continue advocating for individuals affected by the Kabaziguruka Supreme Court decision, which calls for the prospective annulment of military court actions against civilians.
The ULS acknowledged challenges, including government funding constraints and transparency issues, but expressed commitment to exploring alternative funding sources to pursue justice for those impacted.
In his remarks, ULS Vice President Asiimwe Anthony urged citizens to remain vigilant, assuring the public that the Radical New Bar remains steadfast in its dedication to upholding constitutionalism and protecting citizens’ rights.
The Uganda Law Society has played a key role in safeguarding the rule of law and judicial independence in Uganda, often challenging legislation that it perceives as undermining constitutional principles.