Is the new environment protection for a move forward or a step backward?
Recently, the Ugandan government launched the Environment Protection Force (EPF), a new paramilitary entity under the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), aimed at bolstering enforcement of the National Environment Act No. 5 of 2019.
This development, announced during World Environment Day celebrations, has generated mixed reactions, reflecting broader concerns about governance, militarization, and environmental conservation strategies in Uganda.
Keep Reading
The creation of the EPF is in accordance with Section 25 of the National Environment Act, which mandates NEMA to establish a dedicated force to enforce environmental laws.
The newly minted EPF will operate as a fully-uniformed paramilitary force, with its personnel appointed by NEMA in consultation with the Uganda Police Force.
The force's primary responsibilities include monitoring and enforcing compliance with environmental laws, providing rapid responses to environmental law violations, conducting round-the-clock surveillance, investigating environmental crimes, and prosecuting offenders under the directives of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).
At first glance, the establishment of the EPF appears to be a significant stride toward addressing Uganda's persistent environmental challenges.
The country's ecosystems have faced considerable threats from illegal logging, mining, pollution, and wildlife trafficking. A dedicated force ostensibly equipped to tackle these issues head-on could be a game-changer, ensuring stringent enforcement of environmental regulations.
However, the formation of a paramilitary force to handle environmental protection raises several critical concerns. Firstly, the militarization of environmental enforcement could lead to human rights abuses and exacerbate tensions between local communities and authorities.
Uganda has a history of using force in ways that have sometimes led to conflict and unrest. By adopting a paramilitary approach, there is a risk that the government could prioritize force over dialogue and community engagement, essential components of sustainable environmental stewardship.
AI generated
