OPINION: Why we must all pay our fair share of taxes
By Regina Navuga
At this critical time when developing countries like Uganda urgently need resources to address the climate crisis and finance the much-needed social services and welfare programmes like healthcare, education, social protection and infrastructure, effective, fair and inclusive taxation ismore important than ever.
Keep Reading
Beyond mobilizing sufficient revenue, effective taxation is an essential component of the fulfillment of the social contract, curbing income inequality and an important step towards building a fairer and more inclusive future for all.
While challenges like tax evasion and avoidance still persist, we cannot abandon our obligation to pay taxes. As has been said, “Tax is the glue in the social contract and the price we pay for civilisation.”
Tax is a social act – a reflection of our belief in a better society, and a contribution to it. Similarly, the need for everyone to pay their fair share of taxes to raise sufficient revenue and build an economy that works for all has also increasingly come to the fore and has become a
major point of debate.
On the contrary, tax evasion deprives government of critical resources needed to grow and provide vital services to its citizens which disproportionately affects the most vulnerable and marginalised categories of people especially the women, youths, among others.
Therefore, a more progressive tax system where everyone contributes proportionally to their income is important.
To improve the current tax system, the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development in Uganda is seeking public input into the proposed tax policy for the upcoming Financial Year (FY 2024/25).
This is an opportune moment to amplify our concerns and advocate for a fairer and more inclusive and progressive tax system.
Over the years, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) such as the Tax Justice Alliance Uganda have successfully advocated for progressive tax measures where government has among others developed the tax expenditure governance framework and embarked on reviewing the
harmful tax incentives and exemptions.
In the financial year 2023/24, Uganda introduced a digital service tax targeting non-resident companies such as Twitter, Amazon and Netflix profiting from Uganda's increasing digital space.
However, although the country is making strides, there is still need to fast track and address some of the challenges which we still curtailing mobilisation of sufficient revenue.
The case of Bujagali Energy Limited (BEL) serves as a good example in the broader conversation about tax justice and how revenue could be foregone.
While we acknowledge the potential benefits of the project, its crucial to analyse the benefits and associated costs.
Last year, an additional one-year tax exemption was granted to BEL to allow an Adhoc Committee of Parliament to assess its performance.
Previously, the committee's findings revealed that from 2018 to 2021, BEL's declared exempt income resulted in a significant loss of corporate income tax (CIT) exceeding shs388.7 billion. This loss in revenue, if it does not outweigh the benefits accrued from the tax incentive, has the potential to contribute to more funds allocated to cater for the unfunded priorities in the critical social sectors like education and health.
Despite this exemption, Uganda's electrification rate remains low at 24%. This low rate can be attributed to numerous factors, including high tariff costs for consumers due to capacity charges and insufficient transmission lines.
While Bujagali has contributed to reducing blackouts and lowering overall tariff costs, the current rate of US cents 8.49 per kWh remains higher than the expected post-exemption rate of US cents 6.55 per kWh.
The Adhoc committee's observation, highlighting that even with the 30% CIT, the tariff could still be lower than the current rate, further emphasizes the need for deeper analysis on the decision to be made by government.
A thorough investigation is crucial to understand why the expected tariff reduction was not achieved and to assess the true impact of the tax exemption on electricity costs and national development.
That said, it is important to note that building a robust and equitable tax system is not solely the government's responsibility; it demands active participation from every citizen. This responsibility does not only fulfill our individual obligation to pay taxes but also engaging in constructive dialogue, demanding accountability, and advocating for reform.
We can start by educating ourselves on tax policies, identifying interested parties and fostering collaborations, participating in public consultations, and holding duty bearers accountable.
Remember, transparency and public oversight are crucial deterrents against potential abuse and can promote efficiency and a positive attitude towards paying taxes since citizens follow their money.
To this end, taxation remains the most sustainable way to finance development. By embracing shared responsibility, advocating for fairness, and actively engaging citizens in shaping the tax policy landscape, we can ensure that taxation serves its intended purpose of raising revenue, repricing, redistribution, and representation.
Beyond paying taxes, its paramount for citizens to engage duty bearers and demand for accountability as this goes a long way in strengthening the social contract.
Regina Navuga is a Tax Policy Analyst, SEATINI Uganda
Email: nregina@seatiniuganda.org
