Home News Story
News

Kabale LC1 Aspirants Divided Over Lining-Up Voting System Ahead of Local Council Elections

Local Council aspirants in Kabale District have expressed mixed reactions to the Electoral Commission's decision to retain the lining-up voting method for the upcoming LC1 and LC2 elections, with some warning that the…

By 3 min read
LC1 and LC2 aspirants in Kabale District are divided over the Electoral Commission's decision to use the lining-up method of voting in next month's Local Council elections.

The Electoral Commission has scheduled the LC1 chairperson elections for July 28, 2026, and the LC2 polls for August 10, 2026, following the release of Shs56 billion by the government to facilitate the electoral process. The last Local Council elections were held in 2018.

While many aspirants welcomed the announcement of the election dates, some expressed concern that the lining-up system could divide communities and encourage voters to choose leaders based on family relationships rather than competence and merit.

Darlison Kyinahaigwe, the National Resistance Movement (NRM) flag bearer for Central Cell, said the voting method may disadvantage capable candidates because voters could feel compelled to support relatives and close associates.

"In large families, people feel pressured to line up behind their relatives instead of voting for the most capable person," Kyinahaigwe said.

Jackson Byarugaba, who is contesting for leadership in Rwanyena Parish, shared similar concerns, arguing that the system could ultimately affect service delivery if voters prioritize family connections over leadership abilities.

However, other aspirants defended the lining-up system, saying it promotes transparency and enables communities to elect leaders based on trust and proven performance.

David Kasigwa, the NRM flag bearer for Gaju Cell, said voters are well aware of the capabilities and integrity of aspiring leaders and are likely to make informed choices.

"People know the leaders who have served them well and those they can trust. I believe communities will vote based on performance," Kasigwa said.

Kitoma Parish aspirant Gordon Tukacungurwa and Rwene Parish hopeful Silver Karimunda also expressed confidence in the system, arguing that residents are familiar with the character and abilities of those seeking leadership positions.

The aspirants further noted that delays in holding the elections had created confusion in some communities, with residents mistakenly assuming that party flag bearers were already elected LC1 chairpersons.

"We hope that fresh elections will boost service delivery and restore confidence in local leadership structures," the aspirants said.

Meanwhile, several LC3 chairpersons welcomed the announcement of the elections, describing them as long overdue.

Onesimus Mutungi of Maziba Sub-county, Francis Niwaha of Buhara Sub-county and Noah Mubangizi of Rubaya Sub-county said the elections would provide communities with an opportunity to renew their leadership and strengthen accountability.

Mutungi observed that some LC1 chairpersons had become complacent after serving for nearly eight years without facing an electoral test.

He further alleged that some local leaders had misused official stamps to extort money from residents, underscoring the need for fresh elections.

"Elections will allow voters to choose accountable LC1 leaders who are committed to serving their communities," Mutungi said.

The upcoming LC1 and LC2 elections are expected to revive grassroots leadership structures, which play a critical role in local governance, conflict resolution and the delivery of community services across the country.

Topics You Might Like

Keep Reading