By Jamirah Khassim
Buganda Kingdom’s Prime Minister, Charles Peter Mayiga, has spoken out against electoral violence in Uganda, warning that it suppresses voter participation and weakens democratic institutions.
Speaking outside Bulange Mengo, Katikkiro Mayiga stressed the importance of peaceful and transparent electoral processes.
His remarks align with global concerns and scholarly findings on the negative impact of election-related violence.
“Electoral violence erodes public trust and keeps voters away from the ballot,” Mayiga said, citing a 2019 Journal of Peace Research study that found voter turnout in sub-Saharan Africa could decline by up to 10% in areas plagued by political violence.
His comments follow renewed scrutiny of Uganda’s electoral environment, particularly after Human Rights Watch’s 2021 report documenting widespread abuses during the general elections.
The report linked several incidents—including unlawful detentions, beatings, and intimidation—to state actors and the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM).
However, Mayiga’s condemnation has sparked criticism, with some accusing him of hypocrisy.
Detractors point to alleged financial ties between the Buganda Kingdom and the NRM—the same party associated with the electoral violence he now denounces.
While Mayiga has not directly addressed the funding allegations, the controversy has rekindled debate over the Kingdom’s political neutrality and the growing influence of the central government on traditional institutions.
As Uganda heads into another election cycle, Mayiga’s call for nonviolence has struck a chord with many citizens.
Yet, it also underscores the delicate balancing act cultural leaders must perform in a charged political climate—where lines between heritage, influence, and state power often blur.