State opposes release of Eron Kiiza’s passport, citing flight risk and ongoing appeal

By Muhamadi Matovu | Tuesday, June 24, 2025
State opposes release of Eron Kiiza’s passport, citing flight risk and ongoing appeal
Default Text
The restriction is not arbitrary but arises from a lawful court directive. It is constitutionally permissible under Article 43(1), which allows limitation of rights in the interest of public order and justice

The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has asked the High Court to dismiss an application by human rights lawyer Eron Kiiza seeking the return of his passport, arguing that doing so would jeopardise ongoing criminal proceedings.

In a sworn affidavit filed in the High Court, Chief State Attorney Joseph Kyomuhendo contends that Kiiza’s travel document is lawfully retained by court under a valid judicial order issued as part of pending criminal proceedings.

Keep Reading

Kiiza was convicted and sentenced to nine months and is currently appealing the decision.

“The restriction is not arbitrary but arises from a lawful court directive. It is constitutionally permissible under Article 43(1), which allows limitation of rights in the interest of public order and justice,” Kyomuhendo stated.

Topics You Might Like

News Eron Kiiza State opposes release of Eron Kiiza’s passport citing flight risk and ongoing appeal

Kiiza had cited infringement of his constitutional rights to liberty, movement, and access to medical care, arguing that the passport impoundment is unlawful and has hindered urgent medical travel.

But the state attorney dismissed the claims as speculative and unsupported by verifiable evidence.

“There is no independent or credible medical documentation presented to justify foreign treatment or show the treatment is unavailable in Uganda,” Kyomuhendo noted.

“Access to healthcare does not equate to an unfettered right to exit the jurisdiction.”

The affidavit warns that releasing the passport could set a dangerous precedent allowing accused persons to use vague claims of personal hardship to override lawful judicial controls.

“The risk of flight is real, especially given the nature of the charges and absence of formal guarantees for the applicant’s return,” the affidavit reads, adding that Kiiza has not applied to vary his bail terms or offered any security to mitigate potential absconding.

The DPP’s office also emphasised that while human rights are fundamental, they are not absolute and can be lawfully limited in pursuit of justice.

It urged the court to maintain the travel restriction until the appeal is resolved or Kiiza applies for a variation of bail terms.

What’s your take on this story?

Important update — help others stay aware

Get Ahead of the News.
Stay in the know with real-time breaking news alerts, exclusive reports, and updates that matter to you.

Tap ‘Yes, Keep Me Updated’ and never miss what’s happening in Uganda and beyond—first and fast from NilePost.