Is Museveni's support for corruption suspects loyalty or lapse?

President Museveni has long been lauded by his supporters for his commitment to justice, even when it means standing by those accused of corruption.

However, critics argue that this stance is a calculated move to maintain power, with the president using his influence to shield the corrupt for political gain.

This debate has sparked intense controversy in Uganda, especially as corruption continues to plague the nation.

Recent statements from both the public and political analysts highlight growing discontent with Museveni's approach.

The Nile Post's Victoria Bagaaya, questions the president's unwavering support for individuals shunned by the public amid ongoing corruption scandals.

"What explains the president's continued support for those the country has rejected?" Bagaaya asks, reflecting broader public sentiment.

The corruption issue has become an "elephant in the room," drawing criticism from all sectors of society. Despite this, Museveni remains steadfast in his support for certain individuals, a stance that has left many questioning his true intentions.

A memorable quote from the president, "Why wouldn’t I support Anita?" exemplifies his resolve to stand by those he deems honest, despite public outcry.

This dual approach—supporting the corrupt while simultaneously condemning corruption—has left many Ugandans frustrated. Nicholas Opiyo, a prominent activist, accuses Museveni of lacking the will to tackle corruption.

"Museveni has no zeal to fight the corrupt; he’s merely politicking. His main aim is to stay in power, so wherever he can gain support, he will align himself. If the corrupt can offer him a constituency, he will stand with them. If the public demands arrests, he will pretend to be with them," Opiyo asserts.

In contrast, the Secretary-General of the National Resistance Movement (NRM), Richard Todwong, defends the president, portraying him as a leader who sticks to facts rather than succumbing to public pressure.

"He is a very reliable individual. The whole world can turn against you, but the president will stand with you if he’s convinced you’re honest. However, if he believes you’re not patriotic, he will abandon you," Todwong argues.

A new layer of complexity was added to this debate when President Museveni publicly questioned Speaker Anita Among about her finances. During a recent event, the president pointedly asked, "Where do you get the money to invest in all these projects?"

This question, posed in front of a large audience, has fueled further speculation about the president's intentions. Is Museveni genuinely concerned about potential corruption within his inner circle, or is this a calculated move to maintain a veneer of accountability?

Adding to the controversy, Museveni's comments during the launch of the Bukedea Sports Stadium—built by Speaker Among—stirred further debate. Defending his support for her, the president stated:

"Why should I not support Anita Among? She has done a commendable job in building this stadium for her community. We need to support leaders who are delivering tangible results for the people."

This statement underscores Museveni's justification for standing by Among, positioning his support as a reward for her contributions rather than an endorsement of any wrongdoing.

Despite these defenses, the president’s recent acknowledgment of widespread graft within the system, coupled with international sanctions citing corruption, raises questions.

Is Museveni merely standing with his own, or is he genuinely unaware of the extent of corruption in his government?

Opiyo remains skeptical, suggesting that the corrupt have become more powerful than Museveni himself.

"He cannot conclusively fight corruption," Opiyo states, echoing a widespread concern among Ugandans.

As the debate rages on, the question remains: Has President Museveni backtracked on his commitment to fight corruption, or is he navigating a complex political landscape where loyalty outweighs public opinion?

The future of Uganda's battle against corruption may hinge on how this question is ultimately answered.