The People’s Front for Freedom (PFF) has accused the judiciary of orchestrating a Supreme Court ruling that will justify the continued prosecution of opposition figures in military courts.
With the long-awaited verdict in the Kabaziguruka versus Attorney General case set to be delivered this Friday.
While addressing the media in Kampala yesterday, PFF warned that the decision could set a dangerous precedent, paving the way for further suppression of political opponents, including Dr. Kizza Besigye, through military trials.
The case, which has been pending since 2021, questions the legality of trying civilians in the General Court Martial. The controversial debate surrounding military trials has now reached a defining moment, with PFF leaders claiming that the verdict has already been predetermined to serve political interests.
PFF National Chairman Wasswa Birigwa expressed fears that the ruling would reinforce the military’s power over political opponents, particularly those affiliated with PFF
"This ruling will allow the court martial to continue prosecuting opposition leaders, particularly those in PFF. It is a deliberate move to silence political dissent,” said Birigwa.
Francis Mwijukye, the Buhweju County MP, directly cautioned Chief Justice Alfonse Owiny-Dollo against legitimizing the use of military courts against civilians, arguing that doing so would be a violation of constitutional justice.
"The Chief Justice must stop aiding the court martial in trying civilians. If this ruling supports military trials, the judiciary will be responsible for whatever happens to Besigye and other political leaders," Mwijukye warned.
Atkins Katushabe, the Bukonzo West MP echoed similar concerns, alleging that the judiciary is being used to serve political interests rather than uphold the law.
"The Chief Justice was handed a template. We do not expect much from him. But millions of Ugandans are watching, and the judiciary must ensure justice prevails," Katushabe stated.
PFF insists that the case is a political maneuver aimed at maintaining legal pressure on opposition figures. As the Supreme Court prepares to deliver its verdict, the party has put the judiciary on notice, warning against any ruling that contradicts constitutional principles.
However, the judiciary has dismissed these claims, urging the public to wait for the court's decision. Judiciary spokesperson James Eryeemye Mawanda criticised those questioning the Supreme Court’s integrity.
"When I hear people are saying whatever they are saying, I don’t know where they are getting those ideas. I think the best thing to do is to wait for the judgment to be delivered, and from that point, we shall know what the decision has been.
The Supreme Court is enshrined with the duty to uphold constitutionalism. So I think we should disregard whoever is saying whatever they are saying until the Supreme Court delivers that judgment on Friday," Mawanda told Nilepost.