Govt Weighs Karuma Bridge Closure, Again

The Ministry of Works and Transport is evaluating two potential options for repairing the expansion joints on the Karuma Bridge: a full closure or a partial closure allowing light traffic on one side.

The decision comes just weeks after the completion of the first phase of the bridge’s construction, which opened access for light traffic to Northern Uganda.

The government’s commissioning of the Karuma Bridge project on December 20, 2024, marked a significant milestone, improving access to Northern Uganda ahead of the Christmas holiday.

"The objective was to allow light traffic to use the bridge, but this doesn't mean all work is complete. Some materials needed for further work were not available in the country," said Susan Kataike, Principal Communications Officer at the Ministry of Works and Transport.

Now, the Ministry has announced plans to repair the expansion joints. While the specific approach remains under review, the potential for either full or partial closure has raised significant concerns.

Kataike confirmed that the necessary materials for repairs have already been imported, but work has been temporarily halted due to the peak school season.

"The materials are available, but the government is mindful of parents taking children back to school. The technical team is assessing whether the repairs can be done while maintaining traffic flow or whether a full closure will be necessary to complete the work. The team will advise the minister on the best course of action," she added.

However, political leaders from Northern Uganda have expressed serious concerns about the impact of any closure.

Gilbert Olanya, Member of Parliament for Kilak County North, strongly opposed the idea of closing the bridge, warning that it would exacerbate the already fragile economic conditions in the region.

“The people of Northern Uganda have suffered enough from previous closures of Karuma. Another closure will only worsen their economic struggles,” Olanya said.

Local officials from districts like Kiryandongo, which relies heavily on the bridge, have voiced similar concerns, noting a decline in domestic revenue collections during the first phase of the closure.

They fear that any further disruption will cause even greater economic hardship for the region. Washington Ocaya, a councilor from Karuma, questioned whether the over 11 billion shillings already spent on the bridge’s construction would provide value for money if additional disruptions continue.

As the Ministry’s study progresses, it remains unclear whether the government will proceed with a full or partial closure.

The debate among political leaders grows, with many urging the government to consider the long-term impact on local communities before making a final decision.

While the Ministry is expected to finalize its approach soon, any further disruptions to the Karuma Bridge—already a vital economic link for Northern Uganda—could ignite further controversy and opposition.