Kivumbi’s Lawyers Raise Human Rights Concerns in Terrorism Case

By Sulaiman Ssebugwawo | Tuesday, February 3, 2026
Kivumbi’s Lawyers Raise Human Rights Concerns in Terrorism Case
Defence lawyers have asked the Butambala Chief Magistrate’s Court to halt or nullify proceedings against MP Muwanga Kivumbi, citing alleged rights violations, flawed investigations, and disputed death tolls linked to election-period violence.

Lawyers representing Butambala County Member of Parliament and National Unity Platform (NUP) Buganda Deputy President Muwanga Kivumbi have asked court to address what they described as serious violations of their client’s fundamental human rights in the ongoing terrorism case against him.

Addressing the Butambala Chief Magistrate’s Court on Tuesday, Busiro East MP and senior lawyer Medard Ssegona, appearing for Kivumbi’s legal team, told court that his client has never recorded a statement in relation to the terrorism charges he faces.

Keep Reading

Ssegona further submitted that at the time of Kivumbi’s arrest, authorities failed to inform him of the specific offence he was being accused of. According to the defence, Kivumbi only became aware of the charges when he was later produced before court.

The defence also raised concerns about how investigations were conducted. Ssegona told court that when Kivumbi attempted to explain that 10 people were killed at his home during the election period, a police officer from Kira who was questioning him reportedly dismissed the claim.

Topics You Might Like

Human rights Muwanga Kivumbi National Unity Platform Uganda politics election violence Butambala Court Proceedings Terrorism case Kivumbi’s Lawyers Raise Human Rights Concerns in Terrorism Case News

He said the defence was surprised that officers allegedly unfamiliar with the area ignored information provided to them while insisting on pursuing their own version of events.

The prosecution maintains that the alleged election-related violence resulted in the deaths of seven people, a figure the defence strongly disputes.

Ssegona argued that cases of such gravity require transparent, impartial, and professional investigations. He submitted that if investigations were carried out in the manner alleged by the defence, then all evidence obtained should be rendered invalid.

The lawyers also told court that transferring Kivumbi to court without notifying his lawyers or even his wife was unconstitutional and amounted to a violation of his rights.

They asked court to dismiss the prosecution’s application. In the alternative, they urged the magistrate to order that all evidence obtained so far be discarded and that fresh investigations be conducted by impartial officers.

The defence further asked court to direct that investigations extend to the killings that allegedly occurred at Kivumbi’s home, insisting that clarity must be established on the disputed number of fatalities.

What’s your take on this story?

Get breaking news first — follow us

Get Ahead of the News.
Stay in the know with real-time breaking news alerts, exclusive reports, and updates that matter to you.

Tap ‘Yes, Keep Me Updated’ and never miss what’s happening in Uganda and beyond—first and fast from NilePost.