Home Court Story
Court

Stop Running to Museveni Over Court Decisions - Mao

Justice minister says many people keep running to President Museveni to overturn court decision which compromises th independence of the judiary

By 2 min read
Justice Minister Norbert Mao has raised concerns over increasing interference in the judiciary, condemning efforts to intimidate judges through direct appeals to the President.

Speaking at the 29th Government of Uganda–Development Partners Access to Justice Sub-Program Annual Review event in Munyonyo, Mao highlighted instances where influential individuals bypass legal channels, filing complaints against judges directly with the executive.

“Some of our judges are being threatened by petitions to the President. If you lose a case, for God’s sake, appeal. Don’t write to the President accusing the judge of all sorts of things,” Mao said.

He cited a current case where a judge is reportedly under suspension following accusations of bias by a Cabinet minister.

Mao warned that such practices undermine judicial independence and erode public confidence in the courts.

He expressed concern about the impact on judges, particularly those in acting capacities, who may feel pressured. “Being wrong as a judge is not an offence.

Judgments are opinions applying facts to the law, and your opinion can be wrong. That’s why we have these appeal courts,” he explained.

The Justice Minister also called on the judiciary to expedite case resolutions to avoid perceptions of corruption or bargaining.

“Make a quick decision. After all, you know the law,” Mao urged, stressing that delays in judgment only fuel suspicions of unethical conduct.

In a direct appeal to senior judicial leaders, Mao encouraged them to empower judges and protect them from undue pressure.

“Tell them you’ll stand by them when they make a decision that is sound in line with the law. Otherwise, what will be the point?” he asked.

Mao’s remarks underscore the tension between Uganda’s judiciary and executive powers, sparking vital questions about the independence of the judiciary in a system increasingly vulnerable to political interference.