DP members and political commentators ask Nobert Mao to step down for party to rise up again, as it nears 70th Anniversary
The Democratic Party (DP) is approaching its 70th anniversary in Ugandan politics, but for many, the party’s legacy appears fragile, overshadowed by internal divisions and questions of leadership.
Once a powerhouse, DP now finds itself grappling with concerns over its future under the leadership of Nobert Mao, the party’s president for the last 15 years.
Some party members argue that DP has lost its way. “The DP we know from history is not what we see today,” said Ssebuliba Mutumba, a veteran DP member, highlighting a sentiment shared by defectors and current members alike.
Critics believe that Mao’s leadership, particularly his decision to align with the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM), has weakened the party, making it more vulnerable in an increasingly competitive political landscape.
Founded in 1954, DP was initially a beacon for young Baganda Catholics, opposing the dominance of the Buganda Lukiiko, the then-decision-making body of Buganda. DP’s symbol a hoe reflected its agricultural roots and its fight for the rights of ordinary Ugandans.
“The party’s contributions to Uganda’s independence cannot be overstated,” said political analyst Mwambutsya Ndebesa. “It was a party built on strong ideals, but those ideals seem to have been eroded over time.”
Mao, however, defends his leadership. “DP has made progress under my leadership,” he insists, pointing to the party’s efforts to stay relevant in a political environment dominated by the NRM.
His supporters, like DP Vice President Fred Mukasa Mbidde, believe the party’s alignment with the NRM was a strategic move to facilitate dialogue on Uganda's future.
“We signed the agreement in good faith,” said Mbidde. “It was about positioning DP as a key player in any transition.”
But for others, the deal with the NRM was the final blow. “That agreement killed DP,” said Bukoto Central legislator Richard Ssebamala.
“Mao did it for his interests, not the party’s.” Some members accuse Mao of using DP as a platform to secure his position in government. “It’s no secret that Mao is more interested in maintaining his Cabinet role than fighting for DP’s ideals,” said Ssebamala.
The party’s history is filled with moments of resilience, particularly under the leadership of Paul Ssemogerere, who steered DP through some of Uganda’s most turbulent political times. Ssemogerere led the party from 1980 until he handed over to John Ssebaana Kizito in 2006, who further solidified DP’s standing in Buganda.
However, Mao’s tenure has seen increasing dissatisfaction, with calls for his resignation growing louder. “Mao has done enough damage,” said Mutumba. “It’s time for him to go, so DP can rebrand and regain its strength.”
The DP’s internal crisis raises questions about its ability to compete in Uganda’s future elections. With the 2026 general election on the horizon, party members and analysts alike are asking whether DP can overcome its divisions.
“If DP is going to be relevant in 2026, it needs new leadership and a clear vision,” said Ndebesa. “Otherwise, it risks becoming an escort party in Ugandan politics.”
Despite the criticism, Mao remains defiant. “I am committed to DP and its values,” he said, emphasizing that his leadership is far from over. However, the question remains: Can the DP, nearly 70 years old, rise from its current struggles, or will it remain a shadow of its former self?
As the party prepares for its next chapter, all eyes will be on DP’s ability to address its leadership vacuum and re-establish itself as a formidable force in Ugandan politics.