WhenUnited Nationschief Antonio Guterres begged the world to help Uganda deal with ‘the biggest refugee exodus in Africa since the Rwandan genocide’, Britain led the way with a big injection of foreign aid.
Ministers offered an extra £40 million on top of the £111 million already spent in the East African country last year, and billions given to UN and European agencies.
A Daily Mail investigation has discovered that at least four separate investigations have been launched into fears greedy officials in the prime minister’s office distorted and inflated refugee figures to exploit the situation and fleece foreign aid budgets.
The UN says there are 1.46 million refugees in Uganda from conflicts in neighbouring nations.
But a spot check on 26,000 recorded refugees confirmed only 7,000, with as many as 19,000 thought to be ‘ghost’ registrations.
“There’s certainly a scam going on,’ said a UK official. “We are just not sure how big a scam.
Uganda is rightly praised for its friendly stance to refugees, offering them land in settlements rather than forcing them into grim camps. This has led to enthusiastic support from major donors such as Britain.
‘Thanks to UK aid, refugees reaching Uganda are receiving shelter, food, medical care, a measure of safety and the hope for a future,’ said former Dfid secretary Priti Patel on a visit last summer to the sprawling Bidibidi settlement.
This area of northern Uganda is claimed as the world’s biggest refugee encampment, housing about 270,000 people, mostly fleeing war in South Sudan.
Last year UN agencies and major charities spent £66 million of UK taxpayer cash on the humanitarian crisis in Uganda, largely through bodies such as the World Food Programme (WFP) and refugee agency UNHCR.
The response was co-ordinated by Uganda’s OPM, despite Britain and other Western donors stopping direct support in 2012 after millions of pounds were siphoned from that department into private accounts.
Now it is suspected that some officials saw refugees as a means to make money by stealing food supplies, that they took kickbacks for lucrative contracts and traded UN registrations for sex or cash.
‘We believe the corruption has been going on a long time,’ said one UN source. Another senior UN official said the key question was whether theft was ‘institutional or by individuals’.
Doubts over refugee data arose seven months ago following complaints involving food distribution in a settlement near Rwanda.
The WFP carried out a spot check on 26,000 registered refugees, and found only 7,000 people turning up for help. The shock revelation led to the dismissal of a big US charity running the programme.
Filippo Grandi, the head of UNHCR, flew in to hold crisis meetings with UN and donor teams.
Days later, the organisation’s Uganda representative wrote to the Ugandan government to highlight concerns.
These included ‘incidences of gross mismanagement, fraud and corruption in Uganda refugee operations’, according to a letter sent to the Prime Minister’s office by Hilary Onek, Minister for Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Refugees.
The letter, seen by this newspaper, alleged ‘numerous thefts of relief items and misapplication of government land for themselves’ by OPM officials, along with allegations of ‘trafficking minor girls and women married to men not of their choice’.
Britain suspended funding for four days, then began to ‘unsuspend’ donations after accepting new safeguards.
UN sources believe significant relief supplies ended up on the black market and dodgy contracts were doled out.
‘In one zone alone I know of five operating partners that are NGOs [non-governmental organisations] linked to OPM people,’ said a Western contractor.
Markets in settlement areas and nearby towns openly display relief items on sale still in WFP packaging.
These include maize, beans and child nutrition packs, along with solar-charging devices and even entire boxes of cutlery.
Some are small quantities sold by refugees to buy food to vary their dreary diet. But traders admitted they buy much bigger supplies from corrupt state officials.
Peter, a South Sudanese man selling food inside Bidibidi, told me he travelled to a town 60 miles away and bought 50 sacks of WFP maize at a time.
These were piled up behind him in a small but well-stocked storeroom. ‘I buy from the host community,’ he said. ‘There is much of this for sale.’
Now urgent attempts are being made to verify refugee numbers, with insiders saying the Ugandan statistics are distorted by systematic abuse.
Thousands have been removed from lists – up to 40 per cent in some areas, say sources – and others added. ‘They are desperate to get the number over one million,’ said a refugee adviser.
Western advisers and experts said everyone knew the numbers were unreliable. ‘It was an open secret,’ said a contractor. ‘It was raised repeatedly in meetings.’
One major international charity carried out its own checks early last year in Bidibidi and found substantial inflation of figures.
‘It became clear the numbers in camps were much lower than the authorities and UNHCR were estimating,’ said a source.
But Robert Baryamwesiga, OPM commandant at Bidibidi, said: ‘It’s not like counting cattle.
‘We are dealing with human beings who move around, return home and progress.’
It is understood at least five OPM officials, including one senior official, have been suspended.
Uganda’s government also claims to be looking into ‘connivance’ with international aid agency staff.
‘There is some collusion between individuals in the UN system, the implementing agencies and individuals in the government agency responsible,’ said Obiga Kania, state minister of internal affairs whose constituency is near Bidibidi.
‘The offer of an open refugee policy is genuine but we need to be clean.
‘There is obviously inflation in numbers. Another problem is the awarding of contracts because people get favours. Sometimes they do no work at all.’
I saw one charge sheet alleging that four mid-ranking OPM officials transferred more than £71,000 into their bank accounts over a single three-month period.
Two were also accused of making false expenses claims over the same time worth £99,000.
Yet one of the men, a camp manager, claims he is the fall guy after his boss told him to hand back funds raised in a special budget to help refugees, then took the cash.
This was possible, he says, since foreign aid arrived to pay for refugees.
Refugees told me officials demanded up to £150 for registration forms entitling settlement and food aid.
Some female refugees in Uganda also say sexual abuse is rife, echoing claims involving the UN and major charities such as Oxfam in other relief zones.
I spoke to three women from Democratic Republic of Congo and one from Burundi who told horrifying tales of assault by police officers, charity staff and officials.
One teenager said she fled Bukavu in DRC aged 11 after seeing her father shot and mother stabbed to death by soldiers.
‘When I went to the police to register, an officer said I must sleep with him,’ said Winnie. ‘I did not really understand since I was so young.’
Later, she said, she was forced to sleep with a worker from a local charity and became pregnant. ‘I’m so desperate,’ she said.
There have been claims of South Sudanese women being trafficked from refugee camps back over the border for sale to combatants.
The scandal should not surprise Dfid since its own internal four-year strategy plan for Uganda, seen by this paper, warns about such theft.
‘Corruption is a major obstacle to development in Uganda,’ it reported. ‘A failure to sanction the corrupt has led to a perception of impunity that has weakened public sector effectiveness.’
The legacy of donor complacency leaves refugees as victims twice over: first of chaos and carnage in a war zone, then of dismal failures in a place supposed to offer sanctuary.
Pauline Anek is the sort of person our aid policies are meant to assist – a mother of five children who fled conflict and now relies on relief efforts to survive in Bidibidi.
When we meet, Anek, 30, is preparing pumpkin leaves to cook with a few beans. Her son Ivan stands beside her chair, staring intently at the pitiful ingredients for his next meal.
The distended belly on another of her five children indicated signs of malnutrition.
Anek dragged from her hut a small bag of beans, a bigger one of maize and a container of cooking oil, all supplied by United Nations relief agencies with help from British taxpayers.
‘This food does not last the whole month. After 15 days it is finished and we have nothing for two weeks,’ she says.
Even these pathetic portions – designed as the minimum needed for human sustenance – may be cut soon by the WFP. Meanwhile there has been a cholera outbreak in the settlement areas.
Uganda also highlights wider issues with aid. Britain pumps cash into a corrupt and authoritarian regime, run by a security-obsessed 73-year-old ruler who has been in power for 32 years and recently bribed MPs to scrap the presidential age limit of 75.
Foreign aid provides almost two and a half times as much as tax to state coffers. Yet Uganda’s health budget was cut this year, while Dfid’s leaked internal report admits per capita education spending ‘has fallen in recent years.’
A DFID spokeswoman insisted it had zero tolerance for theft or sexual exploitation and added that UK aid was saving lives and supporting refugees to become self-reliant and boost the economy.
Adopted from The Daily Mail, UK